Occurrence record: Murray-Darling Basin fish monitoring survey - 60417-PRG1001-20150401-ELB-4-NEMERE
MachineObservation
of
Nematalosa erebi
| Tukari
recorded on 2015-04-01
Dataset
Data resource | Murray-Darling Basin fish monitoring survey |
Catalogue number | 60417-PRG1001-20150401-ELB-4-NEMERE |
Basis of record | Machine observation |
Individual count | 57 |
Associated Occurrence Status | Representative record |
Inferred Associated Occurrences |
This record has 6 inferred associated occurrences
For more information see Inferred associated occurrence details |
Licence | CC-BY-Int |
Sampling protocol | Boat |
Establishment means | native |
Institution code | MDBA |
Occurrence status | present |
Institution id | in94 |
Abcd identification qualifier | Not provided |
Event
Record date | 2015-04-01 |
Sampling protocol | Boat |
Date precision | Day |
Verbatim event date | 01-04-2015 |
Taxonomy
Scientific name | Nematalosa erebi |
Taxon rank | species |
Common name |
Tukari
Supplied common name "Bony herring" |
Kingdom | Animalia |
Phylum | Chordata |
Class | Actinopterygii |
Order | Clupeiformes |
Family | Clupeidae |
Genus | Nematalosa |
Species | Nematalosa erebi |
Taxonomic issues | No issues |
Name match metric |
Exact match
The supplied name matched the name exactly. |
Name parse type | SCIENTIFIC |
Geospatial
Country | Australia |
State or territory | South Australia |
Local government area | Mid Murray (DC) |
Locality | Lower Murray |
Latitude | -34.6124475 |
Longitude | 139.61356 |
Geodetic datum | EPSG:4326 |
Verbatim coordinate system | decimal degrees |
Verbatim locality | Lower Murray |
Minimum elevation in metres | 5.0 |
Maximum elevation in metres | 5.0 |
Location remarks | valley=Lower Murray; reportingZone=Middle |
Coordinate precision | Unknown |
Verbatim srs | EPSG:4326 |
Biome | Terrestrial |
Verbatim elevation | 5.0 |
Verbatim longitude | 139.61356 |
Verbatim latitude | -34.6124475 |
Data quality tests
Test name | Result |
Habitat incorrect for species | Failed |
First of the month | Warning |
Occurrence status assumed to be present | Warning |
Country inferred from coordinates | Warning |
Basis of record not supplied | Passed |
Basis of record badly formed | Passed |
Invalid collection date | Passed |
Incomplete collection date | Passed |
First of the year | Passed |
Cultivated / escapee | Passed |
Missing catalogue number | Passed |
Data are generalised | Passed |
Name not supplied | Passed |
Name not recognised | Passed |
Invalid scientific name | Passed |
Name not in national checklists | Passed |
Decimal coordinates not supplied | Passed |
Geodetic datum assumed WGS84 | Passed |
Unrecognized geodetic datum | Passed |
Altitude out of range | Passed |
Altitude value non-numeric | Passed |
Altitude value supplied in feet | Passed |
Min and max altitude reversed | Passed |
Coordinates are transposed | Passed |
Coordinates are out of range for species | Passed |
Supplied coordinates are zero | Passed |
Zero latitude | Passed |
Zero longitude | Passed |
Location not supplied | Passed |
Supplied coordinates centre of state | Passed |
Coordinates centre of country | Passed |
Missing geodetic datum | Passed |
Show/Hide 12 missing properties | |
Show/Hide 42 tests that have not been run |
Inferred associated occurrence details
This record has been identified as the representative occurrence in a group of associated occurrences. This mean other records have been detected that seem to relate to this record and this particular record has the most detailed information on the occurrence. More information about the duplication detection methods and terminology in use is available here: